
The Budget Crisis May Yield Sea Change in Election Politics
Published in The New York Times on Saturday, February 21, 2009
By: Jennifer Steinhauer
The aricle is entirely about one change proposed in addition to approving the California state budget. Steinhauer claims California is doing what it always does well, re-vamping the way America does things. The highlight issue in the article was the approval of adding a proposed contitutional amednment. Cutting down to the chase, California lawmakers might be suggesting that we throw out political parties during election time. It is being called the "open-primary idea" and most California lawmakers are backing it up. Primary elections decide who a political party nominates as a candidate for the following general election. In a closed primary, people may vote in a party's primary only if they are registered members of that party and Independents cannot participate. With the proposed open primary, a registered voter may vote in any party primary regardless of his own party affiliation. Does this mean that voters will start to cross over into different parties during the primary? Well, I think so. I think that many people will begin to disragard their parties because we are allowed to do what is known as "decline to state".
I wonder, could this change the process of our elections? Also, why would California lawmakers add this onto the state's budget agreement?
The article and photograph are both courtesy of the New York Times and was retrived from http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/21/us/21calif.html?_r=1&sq=californiabudgetcrisi&st=cse&scp=1&pagewanted=all
